The defect nearly cost a woman her good reputation - and her child - by "transforming" coffee drinking into solvent sniffing.
The video is here: http://www.healthprivacysummit.org/events/2012-health-privacy-summit/custom-129-ec40d08a35f947e487f68a5f534a9e82.aspx
|Dr. Monteith on how bad health IT damages trust. See video at this link starting at 4:40.|
Dr. Monteith starts at 4:40 when he is asked
"Do you feel HIT affects the willingness of patients to share sensitive information with providers?"
His answer is a definite "yes", and the video should be seen to understand his reasons, the largest one being the trust that is injured by this technology as currently (mal)implemented, failing to maintain privacy, data integrity, affecting doctor-patient interaction (e.g., due to poor usability), etc.
His two examples where HIT has injured trust, resulting in decreased willingness of patients to share sensitive information:
- A patient feared compromised privacy regarding psychiatric information (a fear that was certainly well-justified in view of ABC's recent expose of health IT breaches as I wrote about at my Sep. 14, 2012 post "A Reason to Refuse Use of EHR's in Your Health Care, and Demand Paper.")
- An error in EHR-generated record affecting a child custody battle, with a husband alleging unfitness of the mother due to substance abuse. The EHR incorrectly showed a damaging diagnosis due to both a data mapping flaw (lumping multiple diagnoses under the same code) and a user interface flaw (permitting all of the diagnoses lumped under that code to not be seen, only the worst one) that transformed caffeine (i.e., coffee) overuse to "inhalant abuse."
Stunningly, Dr. Monteith reported the error was not remediated even after several years.
As seen by the voluntary reports submitted by one of many HIT sellers (link), the only one that seems to do so, and some involuntary ones such as at this link, these issues are just the "tip of the iceberg." That exact phrase was uttered by a senior FDA official himself, reflecting known severe impediments to information diffusion on harms, as I reported at this link.
Yet the government (e.g., HHS's Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, ONC) and IT industry push this technology like candy, emphasizing largely unproven benefits and completely ignoring downsides such as damaged trust, damaged reputations that could have cost a woman custody of her child, and damaged bodies.
A video of an attorney personally affected by these issues is at this link: http://www.healthprivacysummit.org/events/2012-health-privacy-summit/custom-137-ec40d08a35f947e487f68a5f534a9e82.aspx