Yet Transparency International's report on global health care corruption suggested it occurs in all countries. A recent TI survey showed that 43% of US citizens believe the country has a health care corruption problem (look here).
In the last few weeks, there have been two major US news stories that seem to clearly involve allegations of health care corruption, but not in so many words. Both were big because the indicted were sitting governors of big US states.
Governor Rick Perry (Republican - Texas) Indicted for Abuse of Power
The biggest story seems to be the indictment of Rick Perry, the Republican Governor of Texas. Here is a summary from the Washington Post,
A grand jury indicted Texas Gov. Rick Perry (R) on two felony counts Friday, alleging that he abused his office and used a veto threat to coerce an elected district attorney to resign.
The grand jury began considering charges against Perry earlier this year following an ethics complaint alleging that he abused his veto power when he cut funding for the state’s anti-corruption unit, which is part of the Travis County district attorney’s office.
He had called on Rosemary Lehmberg (D), the district attorney for Travis County, which includes Austin, the state capital, to step down after she was arrested in April 2013 for drunken driving. Lehmberg pleaded guilty to driving while intoxicated — an open bottle of vodka was found in her car — and was sentenced to 45 days in jail.
Perry threatened to veto $7.5 million in state funding for her office unless Lehmberg resigned. She refused, and Perry followed through on his veto threat, saying that he could not provide the money 'when the person charged with ultimate responsibility of that unit has lost the public’s confidence.'
There has been a big kerfuffle over this indictment, with the majority seeming to think it is some sort of political stunt that will have little effect on Mr Perry. For example, the Washington Post later ran an editorial calling the indictment "wrong-headed."
However, articles in some less prominent outlets suggested that the indictment actually raised questions about possible corruption, actually health care corruption. For example, James Moore writing in the Huffington Post,
Some of the media appear to have adopted the Perry narrative that he wanted to get rid of an irresponsible Travis County District Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg because she had been arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol.
The PIU had been investigating the Cancer Research and Prevention Institute (CPRIT), a $3 billion dollar taxpayer funded project that awarded research and investment grants to startups targeting cancer cures. The entire scientific review team, including Nobel Laureate scientists, resigned because they said millions were handed out through political favoritism. Investigations by Texas newspapers indicated much of the money was ending up in projects proposed by campaign donors and supporters of Governor Perry. In fact, one of the executives of CPRIT was indicted in the PIU investigation for awarding an $11 million dollar grant to a company without the proposal undergoing any type of review.
As documented by the Cancer Letter, the scientific reviewers at CRPIT quit because of perceptions that the scientific review process was being manipulated, possibly for private gain,
The scientists submitted blistering letters explaining their decisions to leave.'This past spring, the peer review system of CPRIT was dishonored by actions of CPRIT’s administration when a set of grants were delayed in funding because of suspicion of favoritism,' writes Phillip Sharp, chair of the council. 'Further, a proposal based on science similar to that previously reviewed by the CPRIT council was selected for funding using other criteria. These events ultimately led to the resignation of Dr. Gilman. The same events motivate my decision to resign now.'Both Gilman and Sharp are Nobel laureates.The walkout—and, perhaps more so, the letters—send a powerful signal that CPRIT is now outside mainstream cancer science. The controversy—and the instance of 'favoritism' alleged by Sharp—began when the state agency funded an $18 million project spearheaded by Lynda Chin, an MD Anderson scientist and the wife of that institution’s president.
Also see stories in the Nature news blog, and in the Science news blog. Similar connections to the Public Integrity Unit's response to the CRPIT scandal and its indictment of a CPRIT official appeared in the Texas Observer.
In addition, the New Republic published an article suggesting the involvement of Mr Perry and his administration in other cases of alleged health care corruption. These included trying to use state government to mandate a vaccine made by a company for who his former chief of staff was a lobbyist,
His attempt to mandate that Texas girls receive a vaccine for HPV, seemingly at odds with Perry’s social conservatism, looked more explicable when one considered that his former chief of staff was lobbying for Merck, the vaccine’s manufacturer. And yes, Merck contributed $30,000 to Perry over his first decade as governor.
Also, he put appointed to the state board of health top employees of a medical supply company owned by a big campaign contributor, and in which Mr Perry himself also invested,
Perry expressed his gratitude to James Leininger, a staunch conservative whose last-minute loan to Perry helped him narrowly win his 1998 race for lieutenant governor and who gave him $239,000 more over the next decade, by appointing former top employees of Leininger’s hospital-bed company—in which Perry’s personal investment during the ’90s resulted in a $38,000 gain—to the Texas Board of Health,...
Finally, the state Emerging Technology Fund gave considerable money to another friend of and big campaign donor to Mr Perry,
A year earlier, the A&M system had entered into an agreement to develop vaccines with a therapeutics manufacturing firm called Introgen; this put the firm in a position to benefit from the new center. Introgen’s founder, David Nance, is a close friend of Perry’s. He contributed $100,000 to Perry over the decade, he had previously served on the advisory committee of the tech fund awarding the $50 million, and Perry’s son, Griffin, owned Introgen stock between 2001 and 2004.
Introgen had its main drug rejected by the FDA and declared bankruptcy shortly before the $50 million award, but Nance continued to do well by the state. In 2010, the tech fund awarded $4.5 million to his next venture, Convergen, even after a review panel rejected the application. The fund paid Nance’s daughter $70,000 for promotional work, and several fund employees went to work with Nance. Perry also provided $1.9 million in federal funds to a separate Nance venture, Innovate Texas, founded in 2008 as a sort of clearinghouse for Texas tech firms. The outfit paid Nance a six-figure salary. It is now defunct.
Corruption as defined by Transparency International is abuse of entrusted power for private gain. Thus TI does not limit the term to cases involving politicians or government. But surely the indictment of Governor Perry raises multiple questions about political and government corruption by this definition, and this corruption involving health care. The definition used by TI is ethical, not legal, and it is impossible to predict whether Governor Perry will be convicted.
Still, while Texas Governor Rick Perry's indictment was big news, and fodder for a lot of discussion about politicization of the criminal justice system, the multiple issues the case raises about possible health care corruption have been ignored by most major news outlets, and no one so far has labeled the case as having anything to do with "health care corruption," or words to that effect.
Former Governor Robert F McDonnell (Republican - Virginia) on Trial for Bribery and Corruption
Meanwhile, the press has been fascinated with testimony in the bribery and corruption trial of former Virginia Governor Robert McDonnell. In 2013, the Washington Post published a long investigative report about how the Governor and his wife seemed to be promoting a dietary supplement called Anatabloc as an anti-inflammatory agent while accepting various favors from the CEO of the company that made it. The background on the company is
[Johnnie R] Williams’s company, Star Scientific, was introducing a dietary supplement called Anatabloc, whose key ingredient is found in tobacco and other plants.
Anatabloc was crucial to the future of the company, which has been losing money for years. But the science behind the product — an anti-inflammatory the company hopes might be helpful to people with such ailments as Alzheimer’s and multiple sclerosis — was unproven.
The article described how Mr Williams paid $15,000 for the food at the Governor's daughter's wedding, and provided "rides on Williams' corporate jet, personal gifts for the first family...." In fact,
Over eight months during the 2009 gubernatorial election, Star Scientific donated more than $28,500 worth of air travel to McDonnell’s campaign. That commitment increased after McDonnell took office; Star reported donating nearly $80,000 in flights to Opportunity Virginia, the governor’s PAC.
Apparently in return,
Three days before her daughter’s June wedding, Maureen McDonnell flew to Florida, where she spoke at a seminar for scientists and investors interested in anatabine, the key chemical in Anatabloc, according to people who attended the conference.
The governor’s wife told the group that she supported the product and touted the pill, which is not regulated by the Food and Drug Administration, as a way to lower health-care costs in Virginia, the attendees said.
About three months after the wedding, the McDonnells and Star Scientific were together again, this time at the governor’s mansion for the official launch party for Anatabloc.
Although much of the interaction appeared to be between CEO Williams and Mr McDonnell's wife, the Post reported later in 2013,
A prominent political donor purchased a Rolex watch for Virginia Gov. Robert F. McDonnell, according to two people with knowledge of the gift, and the governor did not disclose it in his annual financial filings.
The $6,500 luxury watch was provided by wealthy businessman Jonnie R. Williams Sr., the people said. He is the chief executive of dietary supplement manufacturer Star Scientific
Also, now that the trial is ongoing, there was sworn testimony that Governor McDonnell seemed to be helping to market Anatabloc, as per Reuters,
Virginia Governor Robert McDonnell gave a personal pitch to a state healthcare official for the dietary supplement at the heart of the former governor’s trial on corruption and bribery charges, the official testified on Monday.
Sara Wilson, director of the Virginia Department of Human Resource Management, said McDonnell pulled out a bottle of the product, Anatabloc, at a meeting she and her boss had with him in March 2012 to discuss healthcare.
McDonnell, a Republican, 'said how much it had helped him and his wife,' Wilson said under prosecution questioning on the 11th day of the federal trial.
There was also testimony that Mrs McDonnell tried to market the supplement to 2012 Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney, as stated in a Washington Post article,
After Virginia Gov. Robert F. McDonnell (R) endorsed Mitt Romney for president in 2012, McDonnell’s wife sought out the candidate to promote the dietary supplement now at the heart of the former first couple’s corruption trial, a onetime aide testified Monday.
Maureen McDonnell and then-Star Scientific chief executive Jonnie R. Williams Sr. showed up together at a news media session in South Carolina hoping to pitch Anatabloc to the prominent Republican, said Phil Cox, Robert McDonnell’s chief political adviser at the time.
Cox, also executive director of the Republican Governors Association, said that he put a stop to that plan but that Maureen McDonnell went on to talk up the supplement to Romney’s wife on a campaign bus. He said she told Ann Romney that the anti-inflammatory supplement, Anatabloc, could 'potentially cure MS.'
Now this case is clearly all about allegations of health care corruption. The allegations are that the CEO of a health supplement company provided extensive favors to a politician and his wife, who then made several attempts to market one of his products as treating and possibly curing disease. Yet while these allegations are pretty clear, no one so far has called this a case of possible health care corruption.
By the way, in the last few weeks I also found relatively obscure mentions of two other cases involving allegations of health care corruption. One was a case in which an Ohio state representative took actions on behalf of a health care real estate investment trust that he, his family members own in part, and whose board includes one major political donor (see the AP story via the Providence Journal). The other was a case in which the West Virginia Attorney General had inherited a case from the former office holder involving a drug and medical supply company for which his wife is a lobbyist (see the Charleston Gazette story).
As we have said before, when health care corruption is actually discussed in polite circles, including the scholarly literature about medicine and health care, the discussion usually refers to corruption elsewhere. In particular, in developed countries, discussion of health care corruption usually focuses on less developed countries.
Now we see that when the issue clearly is the possibility of health care corruption, even the news media will avoid using such a term. Articles may describe what amount to health care corruption. They may refer to it as corruption. But they will not pair that term with health care (or medicine, or anything similar). The subject of health care corruption remains taboo. As long as we do not discuss it, some can preserve the illusion that it does not exist. Thus the anechoic effect continues.
So to repeat an ending to one of my previous posts on health care corruption.... if we really want to reform health care, in the little time we may have before our health care bubble bursts, we will need to take strong action against health care corruption. Such action will really disturb the insiders within large health care organizations who have gotten rich from their organizations' misbehavior, and thus taking such action will require some courage.